Construction law · Adjudication · Commercial disputes01403 800246·chris@hqlaw.co.uk
Commercial litigation

Commercial contract disputes for businesses, projects and supply chains.

HQ Law focuses on business-to-business contract disputes where commercial objectives, project evidence and contractual rights need to be analysed together — particularly in construction, engineering, property and related supply chains.

Contract disputes

Interpretation, breach, termination, payment and performance disputes.

Business disputes

Disputes with suppliers, customers, commercial partners and counterparties.

Litigation strategy

Evidence, settlement, proportionality, procedural options and commercial risk.

A focused commercial disputes practice.

The firm is not positioned as a general consumer litigation practice. Its commercial work is centred on contract disputes between businesses, with particular strength where the dispute overlaps with construction, engineering, property, services, payment or project delivery.

HQ Law can help assess the merits and available dispute-resolution routes, including negotiation, mediation, litigation, adjudication or arbitration where applicable.

Where money is owed and not genuinely disputed, HQ Law also uses statutory demands and winding-up petitions to recover debts. See Debt recovery & insolvency.

Commercial decisions

Litigation strategy starts with the remedy, evidence and economics.

A commercial claim should be analysed around what the client actually needs: payment, damages, a declaration, an injunction, enforcement of a contractual right, or a negotiated exit. Early work should identify the governing contract, the core factual dispute, documentary evidence, limitation and procedural deadlines, likely counterclaims, recoverability and the cost/proportionality of litigation.

Does every contract dispute need court proceedings?

No. Negotiation, mediation or another contractual dispute process may resolve the matter more proportionately. The correct route depends on leverage, urgency and the remedy required.

What should be preserved first?

The signed contract and amendments, key correspondence, contemporaneous records, payment documents, relevant board/commercial decisions and any material showing loss or mitigation.

What is the role of the TCC?

Where the dispute is construction or engineering based, the Technology and Construction Court provides a specialist forum for technically complex claims and adjudication-related proceedings.

Why assess settlement early?

Because legal merit is only one part of commercial value. Recoverability, management time, evidence, costs, interest, business relationships and enforcement all affect the rational settlement range.

Construction contracts

Drafting and review before a dispute starts.

HQ Law also advises on the drafting, amendment and review of construction and engineering contracts. The purpose is practical risk allocation: making sure the payment mechanism, scope, design responsibility, programme obligations, change control, notices, termination and dispute-resolution provisions fit the project and are understood before work proceeds.

Contract review

Focused review of JCT, NEC and bespoke terms, amendments and schedules, identifying provisions that materially change commercial or legal risk.

Drafting & amendments

Drafting and revising construction terms, subcontracts, consultant appointments and project-specific amendments so the documents reflect the intended deal.

Project-stage advice

Advice on notices, variations, payment, extensions of time, termination and other contractual steps while the project is live.

Mediation & ADR

Use the process that best serves the commercial outcome.

General litigation is only one route. HQ Law also has mediation experience and advises on negotiation, mediation and other ADR alongside adjudication, arbitration and court proceedings.

A mediation strategy should be built around the merits, evidence, likely litigation cost, enforcement position and the client's real commercial objectives. Where settlement can deliver a better net result, ADR should be considered early rather than treated as an afterthought.

Commercial focus

We keep the likely cost of the next step under review and test it against the amount at stake and the outcome that can realistically be achieved.

Next step

Discuss the commercial dispute

Tell us the parties, contract, amount at stake and key deadline. We will first consider conflicts before substantive confidential information is exchanged.