Construction law · Adjudication · Commercial disputes01403 800246·chris@hqlaw.co.uk
Construction · Engineering · Dispute resolution

Construction lawyers who understand engineering and surveying

HQ Law Limited Solicitors is a specialist construction and commercial practice led by Chris Hough MSc, CEng, FICE. Chris qualified as a solicitor in 1990 after working as a Chartered Civil and Structural Engineer, giving clients legal advice grounded in how projects are designed, built, valued and disputed.

Urgent adjudication? Call Chris Hough on 07843 580 112 or the office on 01403 800246

Free 15-minute initial call. Tell us the parties and the deadline; we run a conflict check first, then talk through the options.

Solicitor since 1990Construction law specialist with a prior engineering career.
Chartered EngineerEngineering and legal analysis in one practice.
Adjudicator experienceDecisions in disputes valued at more than £10 million.
UK & international workProjects and disputes across the UK, Middle East, Africa, Asia and South America.
How we help

Start with the commercial problem.

Construction disputes are usually about cash flow, valuation, delay, defects, scope or a rapidly approaching procedural deadline. Our advice is organised around those commercial triggers so that clients can move quickly from the problem to the relevant options.

Commercial cost control

Winning the point is not enough if the economics do not work.

HQ Law actively controls scope, evidence and legal spend against the value at stake. At each stage we ask what outcome is commercially useful, what it is likely to cost to get there, what can realistically be recovered, and whether negotiation, adjudication, mediation or litigation is proportionate.

The aim is commercial success rather than a pyrrhic victory: a technically successful result should not be outweighed by avoidable cost, delay or enforcement risk.

Cost is part of the strategy

  • Define the issue before building the evidence.
  • Use fixed or staged fees where the work can be scoped.
  • Reassess proportionality when the opponent's position changes.
  • Keep settlement and ADR options live where they improve the net outcome.
View published fees
Engineering perspective

Legal analysis grounded in how projects are designed and built.

Chris’s experience spans roads and bridges, structures, onshore facilities, buildings, tunnels, ports, dry docks and transport infrastructure. That background can be valuable when legal questions depend on programme, causation, scope, design or technical evidence.

Roads & bridgesStructuresBuildingsTunnelsPorts & dry docksOil & gas facilities
See representative experience
Chris Hough

Engineer. Solicitor. Adjudicator.

Chris combines practical engineering experience with more than three decades in construction law. Before founding his own specialist practice, his legal career included Masons, Allen & Overy in Dubai, Speechly Bircham, Ralph Hume Garry and Fenwick Elliott.

MScConstruction Law & Arbitration, King’s College London
CEng · FICEChartered Engineer and Fellow of the Institution of Civil Engineers
AdjudicatorPanel memberships include ICE, RICS, RIBA, TeCSA and UK Adjudicators
View Chris’s experience
Adjudication

Party representation and independent appointments are kept distinct.

HQ Law acts in construction disputes and adjudications. Chris Hough also accepts independent adjudicator appointments. The independent role is presented separately so appointment enquiries, conflicts and party representation are not confused.

Professional experience£10m+

Chris has given adjudicator decisions in disputes valued at more than £10 million.

Latest practical guidance

Answers to the questions that arise when a dispute goes live.

HQ Law publishes focused guidance on adjudication, payment notices, final accounts, evidence and enforcement.

Building safety / proposed legislation

New cladding-remediation Bill: what construction businesses should watch

A Bill introduced on 14 October proposes new remediation duties, a medium-rise building register and changes to construction-product liability. None of these proposals is yet law.

Read the article
Payment / insolvency

Construction payment claims and winding-up petitions: lessons from Amber v Ilyrian

A new High Court judgment explains why a defective payment application, limitation and a serious cross-claim can prevent a winding-up petition—even where another debt is due.

Read the article
Adjudication / enforcement

Adjudication enforcement: when financial risk will not justify a stay

A new TCC decision explains why concerns about a developer SPV or a contractor’s ability to pay need proper evidence before an adjudication judgment can be stayed.

Read the article
Building safety / disputes

Historic building defects: when an earlier time-barred claim does not prevent further proceedings

What Taylor Wimpey v Taylor Woodrow means for historic DPA claims, earlier proceedings and independent statutory rights.

Read the article
Building safety

Gateway 2 approval times: what the latest BSR figures mean for construction projects

Current approval times, application volumes and the contractual consequences of regulatory delay.

Read the article
Litigation

The TCC has moved into the Business and Property Division

What changed on 1 October 2026 for TCC headings, CE-File, court forms and enforcement procedure.

Read the article
Free practical guides

Downloadable checklists for live construction disputes.

Two concise HQ Law guides designed for commercial teams dealing with an adjudication deadline or a construction payment dispute. Download them as PDFs and keep them with the project file.

These guides provide general information only and are not legal advice on a particular contract or dispute.

Construction Disputes Briefing

Practical updates without the noise.

Occasional notes on adjudication, payment, final accounts, delay, defects and enforcement.

Join the briefing
Next step

Discuss the dispute with HQ Law

Tell us who the parties are, what has happened and any immediate deadline. We can then carry out an initial conflict check and consider the next step.